WWW: A reasonably solid evaluation that reflects on some
strengths and weaknesses accurately. You have used media terminology well in
places – if you can make this consistent across all your work then you will
move towards the higher grades.
EBI: This feels rushed. Written English (sentence
structure, paragraphing) is mixed and you don’t follow the suggested structure
– outlining the brief at the beginning of the evaluation. Considering the main
criticism is that your production didn't meet the brief to miss it again is
poor. In general, there’s just not enough depth and detail to your analysis for
the higher grades. You do consider the impact on the audience in places which
is a positive but I’d like much more detailed and specific discussion of
certain shots, transitions etc. The reflection on the lack of effective
planning is important and this is something you definitely need to address for
the real coursework.
LR: Structuring the evaluation better.
Talk more about the strengths and weaknesses rather than the weakness.
Focus on specific things (camera shots, sound etc.).
More depth and analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment